Reactive Programming in the context of Spring WebFlux ( AI Generated )
Sure! Let's dive deep into Reactive Programming in the context of Spring WebFlux, especially as it relates to Java development and interviews.
⚡ What is Reactive Programming?
Reactive Programming is a programming paradigm focused on:
-
Asynchronous data streams
-
Non-blocking behavior
-
Backpressure handling (flow control)
Rather than processing one request at a time, it reacts to events/data as they arrive, making it ideal for handling high-concurrency, I/O-bound, or real-time applications.
π What is Spring WebFlux?
Spring WebFlux is a reactive web framework introduced in Spring 5 and available via Spring Boot 2.x and 3.x.
π Key Characteristics:
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Reactive Stack | Built on Project Reactor |
| Non-blocking I/O | Uses Netty (or can run on Tomcat/Jetty/Undertow in non-blocking mode) |
| Alternative to MVC | WebFlux is to Reactive what Spring MVC is to traditional |
| Functional or Annotated | Supports both annotation-based (@RestController) and functional-style routing |
π§ Why Use WebFlux?
| Scenario | Why WebFlux Helps |
|---|---|
| Handling thousands of concurrent users | Event-driven, async, scalable |
| Building real-time applications (chat, streaming) | Handles streams with minimal threads |
| Making non-blocking HTTP calls (e.g., calling other microservices) | Uses reactive WebClient instead of RestTemplate |
| Saving resources under high load | No thread-per-request overhead |
π© Core Concepts in Spring WebFlux
1. Mono and Flux (from Project Reactor)
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
Mono<T> |
Emits 0 or 1 item |
Flux<T> |
Emits 0 to N items (stream of values) |
These are the reactive equivalents to Optional<T> and List<T> but asynchronous.
@GetMapping("/user/{id}")
public Mono<User> getUser(@PathVariable String id) {
return userService.findById(id); // Non-blocking
}
2. WebClient (Non-blocking HTTP client)
WebClient client = WebClient.create("https://api.example.com");
Mono<String> response = client.get()
.uri("/data")
.retrieve()
.bodyToMono(String.class);
Unlike RestTemplate, WebClient is non-blocking, async, and reactive.
3. Functional Routing Style (Optional Alternative)
@Bean
public RouterFunction<ServerResponse> route(UserHandler handler) {
return RouterFunctions
.route(GET("/user/{id}"), handler::getUser);
}
This replaces @Controller and is more aligned with functional programming paradigms.
π WebFlux vs Spring MVC
| Feature | WebFlux | Spring MVC |
|---|---|---|
| I/O model | Non-blocking, async | Blocking, servlet-based |
| Backpressure | Yes | No |
| Performance | Better under high concurrency | Better for simple, quick apps |
| Thread model | Few threads | One thread per request |
| Use case | Real-time, async microservices | Traditional web apps |
π§ͺ Testing in WebFlux
WebFlux supports reactive testing using StepVerifier.
@Test
public void testReactiveMono() {
Mono<String> mono = Mono.just("Spring");
StepVerifier.create(mono)
.expectNext("Spring")
.verifyComplete();
}
π― Interview Focus Points
Here are common interview questions:
-
What is Reactive Programming?
-
What is the difference between Flux and Mono?
-
When would you use WebFlux over Spring MVC?
-
How does WebClient differ from RestTemplate?
-
Explain backpressure and how WebFlux handles it.
-
How do you test reactive streams?
-
Does WebFlux only work with Netty? (No — it can work with servlet containers too.)
Would you like a visual diagram or code examples comparing WebFlux and Spring MVC side by side?
( Generated by Chatgpt)
Comments
Post a Comment